AGU—Editorial and Visual Communication Design

Graphic Design
Marketing Campaign Design

Project overview

date

July 10, 2025

My role

Graphic Designer

Timeline

3 months

At the American Geophysical Union, I designed Eos magazine layouts and created marketing assets like digital ads, cover concepts, event merch, and certificate templates, ensuring everything aligned with AGU’s brand and communication goals.

What is the goal?

To design clear, engaging visuals that help AGU share Earth and space science and promote its events and global meetings.

Deliverable

  • Monthly Eos magazine layouts (Research Spotlight, News & Opinion, Feature Well, Cover)
  • AGU25, OSM26 digital ad sets (social + web)
  • Full-page print ad for Eos
  • Booth backdrop for AOGS 2025
  • Editable LMS certificate template
  • Social media graphics and ad resizing
  • What Stood in the Way?

    challenge

    Solution

    Design process

    1. Research Phase
    • Usability testing
    • User persona
    • Define user path
    • Heuristic evaluation
    • Competitor analysis
    • Usability test
    2. Ideation Phase
    • IA-card sorting
    • Sitemap
    • User flow
    • Wireframes
    • Mobile wireframe
    • UI style tile
    3. Design Phase
    • UI Style guide
    • Mobile UI design
    • Desktop UI design
    4. Test Phase
    • Usability plan
    • Usability test
    • Test Analysis

    Assumption

    Target User

    Parents of Seniors Students.

    User Needs

    They need Support with college financial planning, like loans and grants, to ensure family stability, along with tools to stay engaged in their children’s education and manage work-life balance.

    Design Challenge

    How might we redesign the U.S. Department of Education website to create a more user-friendly, accessible platform for parents, students, and educators, ensuring easy access to critical information on student loans, grants, and educational resources?

    Research

    Research Method

    • Usability Testing
    • User Interviews: 1 on 1 interviews & Behavioral Interview
    • Heuristic Evaluation Analysis

    Research Goal

    To gain user insights on the usability and clarity of the U.S. Department of Education website. We aim to understand their challenges, preferences, and needs when accessing information on financial aid, grants, and educational resources.

    Key Questions:

    Navigation

    • How easy is it to find grant and loan information?
    • What sections or terms confuse you?

    Content Organization

    • Is the information organized clearly?
    • Does the amount of information feel overwhelming?

    Language & Accessibility

    • Are language options sufficient?
    • Do terms or steps seem unclear?

    01. usability testing

    Objective

    • Measure ease of navigation and clarity in each task.
    • Identify points of confusion or delays.
    • Gather user feedback on improvements for streamlined navigation and better information flow.

    Key Tasks

    • Find Pell Grant Information: Locate and list steps for Pell Grant eligibility.
    • Get Started with Discretionary Grant Applications: Identify the process and total steps for starting a discretionary grant application.
    • Apply for a Grant: Navigate to the application section, find suitable grants, and initiate the application process.
    DOE orginal website design

    Key Takeaway

    Users find it hard to navigate the U.S. Department of Education website due to confusing sections, too much text, and unclear links. Simplifying the navigation, adding clearer visuals, and making language settings easier to find can help users quickly access important information about grants and loans.

    Navigation

    Hard-to-find language settings, broken links, unclear paths, and overwhelming buttons/categories.

    Information Clarity

    Unclear terminology, and lack of concise explanations make it difficult for users to find relevant information quickly.

    Information Overload

    Heavy text, difficulty selecting correct links.

    Visual Design

    Distracting colors, lack of engaging icons/carousels.

    External Links & Terminology

    Confusing redirects, unfamiliar terms (e.g., FSA ID), translation challenges.

    02. user persona

    In our usability testing, we observed how users navigate the DOE website, especially when searching for financial aid information. Many struggled with confusing navigation, too much text, unclear differences between grants & loans, as well as overwelmed information. To better understand these challenges, we created Maria’s persona—a parent managing her child’s education finances, representing a key user group.

    User persona

    Maria Gomez, a 46-year-old office manager, seeks student loans and grants for her child's college expenses. She's tech-savvy and involved in her child's education but worries about the financial impact of debt and is unsure where to start with grants.

    03. Empathy map

    Maria’s challenges with managing college expenses and navigating financial options highlight the need for clear, simplified information on grants and loans. This insight informed our website redesign by focusing on:

    • Streamlined navigation for financial resources.
    • Easy-to-understand guidance on loans and grants.
    • Tools to plan and estimate costs effectively.
    Empathy map

    04. Competitor Analysis

    Our competitor analysis by Patrick (team memeber) shows competitors use dynamic visuals but suffer from clutter or dullness. The redesign will focus on clear navigation, balanced visuals, and engaging aesthetics for a clean, user-friendly homepage.

    An image of competitor analysis

    Competitor analysis form by Patrick

    05. heuristic evaluation analysis

    Heruistic evaluation

    The U.S. Department of Education website faces key usability and accessibility issues, including inconsistent navigation, excessive links, lack of error recovery in the search bar, missing alt text for images, poor color contrast, and inadequate accessibility features like WAI-ARIA attributes. Addressing these challenges with clearer navigation, simplified content, and accessibility improvements will enhance user experience and inclusivity.

    The "Student Loans, Forgiveness" section struggles with jargon, inconsistent link styling, scattered information, and missing definitions. Accessibility issues include lack of alternative text, poor contrast, and insufficient ARIA attributes. Centralizing information and improving design and accessibility will greatly enhance usability.

    Heruistic evaluation
    Heruistic evaluation

    The "Grants" section of the U.S. Department of Education website highlights several usability and accessibility issues. Usability concerns include jargon-heavy language, inconsistent link styling, a missing email icon, and uneven spacing in bullet points.

    Accessibility gaps involve missing alternative text for buttons, insufficient guidance for external links, and the need for larger buttons to support users with mobility impairments. Addressing these problems with clearer language, consistent design, and accessibility improvements will significantly enhance the user experience.

    06. user path

    This wireflow shows the user path through the U.S. Department of Education website, focusing on accessing student loans and grant applications. Key observations from our UX/UI research include:

    User pathy and navigation flow

    07. initial usability test

    We conducted usability testing to uncover navigation issues and confusing instructions in the grant application process. These insights helped us improve the website’s clarity, accessibility, and user experience.

    A image of usability test plan 1A image of usability test plan 2

    Usability testing plan

    A image of usability test report

    Usability testing report

    Testing revealed confusing navigation, dense content, and visual distractions. Users struggled with broken links, unclear sections, and overwhelming text. These findings guided us to simplify navigation, reduce text, and improve visuals for a smoother user experience.

    A image of user paint points

    Pain points data

    my Design Process

    1

    2

    3

    4

    Ideation phase

    Card Sorting

    After synthesizing the initial usability data, we moved into the ideation phase to brainstorm design solutions within the project scope. This process allowed us to develop a clear and user-friendly structure for the website, ensuring users can easily find and understand information.

    1. create cards & Shuffle

    Random content cards were created for Student Loans, Grants, Homepage, and Footer sections. The cards were shuffled to eliminate bias.

    2. group & Label

    Participants grouped related cards and labeled categories. For example:

    • Student Loan Page: Application, Eligibility, Loan Management.
    • Grant Page: Introduction, Application Process, Grant Opportunities.
    • Homepage: Primary Navigation, Policies, Financial Aid.

    3. structure

    Groups were organized into a clear hierarchical structure:

    • Student Loans: Application, Eligibility, Services.
    • Grants: Educational Institutions Grant, Student Grant, Grant Policies.
    A image of card sorting process for IA design

    Card sorting process on Figjam with the team

    Site Map & Information Architecture

    This sitemap shows the restructured navigation for the U.S. Department of Education website. Key sections are clearly organized to improve user experience.

    This structure simplifies navigation by grouping related content, making it easier for users to find loans, grants, and resources. The clear organization supports an intuitive experience, reduces confusion, and helps users access key information quickly.

    An image depicting information architecture

    Design Phase

    Wireframes

    As a team, we worked together to create the initial wireframes and designed simple interactions to quickly test usability.

    An image of wireframes

    Feedback

    During this process, we noticed several important areas for improvement:

    An image of feedback from the team

    Iteration Phase

    High-fidelity prototype

    In the iteration phase of the DOE project, our team refined the designs based on feedback from the initial design phase and usability testing. We improved wireframes, streamlined navigation, and enhanced the interface to better meet the needs of students and educators.

    This iterative process allowed us to optimize visual design and interactivity, delivering a more accessible and user-friendly experience.

    Key updates included:

    • Top Navigation Bar: Enhanced visual prominence with improved hierarchy and contrast to ensure easier navigation.
    • Hero Banner: Incorporated interactive elements and a more dynamic design to increase engagement and functionality.
    • Press Release Section: Redesigned with clear visual distinctions to minimize accidental clicks and improve user flow.
    • Secretary of Education Section: Added clear visual cues for clickable areas to make interactions more intuitive.
    • Student Loan Page: Optimized button sizes and layout for better visual balance and efficient use of screen space.
    An image of high fidelity prototype for the website

    High fidelity prototypes

    Mobile device design

    These mobile wireframes are adapted from the desktop design, ensuring a seamless transition to smaller screens. Starting with desktop allows for establishing a clear information architecture and visual style, which are then streamlined for mobile. This approach ensures feature completeness, consistent branding, and an efficient, user-centered experience on all devices.

    An image of mobile wireframesAn image of prototypes on mobile device

    Color Palette

    competitors

    The Nittany Lions' primary colors are blue and white. The deep blue is often referred to as "Penn State Blue." The simplicity of the blue and white color scheme contributes to a clean and classic aesthetic. The team utilizes a clean typography style in their design materials, the design style of the Penn State football team is characterized by simplicity, tradition, and a focus on core elements.

    The Buckeyes' primary colors are scarlet and gray, scarlet represents passion, energy, and strength while gray adds a touch of sophistication and balance, The team utilizes strong and bold typography in their design materials, design style embodies strength, tradition, and a sense of prestige.

    The Wolverines' primary colors are maize (bright yellow) and blue. Maize is a distinctive color that symbolizes the University of Michigan and is instantly recognizable. The team utilizes classic and bold typography in their design materials. the design style of the football team is classic, elegant, and steeped in tradition.

    Competitor analysis

    The Nittany Lions' primary colors are blue and white. The deep blue is often referred to as "Penn State Blue." The simplicity of the blue and white color scheme contributes to a clean and classic aesthetic. The team utilizes a clean typography style in their design materials, the design style of the Penn State football team is characterized by simplicity, tradition, and a focus on core elements.

    The Buckeyes' primary colors are scarlet and gray, scarlet represents passion, energy, and strength while gray adds a touch of sophistication and balance, The team utilizes strong and bold typography in their design materials, design style embodies strength, tradition, and a sense of prestige.

    The Wolverines' primary colors are maize (bright yellow) and blue. Maize is a distinctive color that symbolizes the University of Michigan and is instantly recognizable. The team utilizes classic and bold typography in their design materials. the design style of the football team is classic, elegant, and steeped in tradition.

    Typography

    Draft

    No items found.

    Final Design

    No items found.

    Design Imapct

    My work contributed to the successful delivery of three monthly issues of Eos magazine and multiple cross-channel design campaigns. The layouts maintained consistency and clarity across editorial content, while the digital assets supported AGU's event promotion and community outreach. The design team was able to reuse and adapt several of my templates for future projects, increasing workflow efficiency.

    Key Takeaway

    This internship taught me how to design with clarity and consistency across both print and digital platforms. I learned to collaborate with marketers and senior designers, follow strict brand and proofing guidelines, stay organized under tight deadlines, and use design as a tool for visual storytelling. Most importantly, I began to explore how design is not just a service, it's a form of communication that shapes meaningful experiences for people.

    Project link

    View the Website

    Social media post

    Printed Brochure

    Back to Work